| | | To Foreignize or To Domesticate
| | 初中英语教育论文Abstract1： Domesticating translation and foreignizing translation are two
different translation strategies. The former refers to the translation
strategy in which a transparent, fluent style is adopted in order to minimize
the strangeness of the foreign text for target language readers, while
the latter designates the type of translation in which a target text deliberately
breaks target conventions by retaining something of the foreigness of the
original. But what is the translation practice like in China? Do translators
tend to use foreignizing methods or domesticating ones? What are the factors
that affect their decision making? This paper tries to find answers to
the questions by looking into the translation of English metaphors into
Chinese.
Key words: domesticating translation; foreignizing translation; metaphor;
target
language reader
1. Introduction
Domesticating translation and foreignizing translation are the terms
coined by L. Venuti (1995) to describe the two different translation strategies.
The former refers to the translation strategy in which a transparent, fluent
style is adopted in order to minimize the strangeness of the foreign text
for target language readers, while the latter designates the type of translation
in which a target text deliberately breaks target conventions by retaining
something of the foreigness of the original (Shuttleworth &Cowie, 1997:59).
The roots of the terms can be traced back to the German philosopher Schleiermacher’s
argument that there are only two different methods of translation, either
the translator leaves the author in peace, as much as possible, and moves
the reader towards him; or he leaves the reader in peace, as much as possible,
and moves the author towards him (Venuti, 1995: 19-20).
The terms foreignization and domestication may be new to the Chinese,
but the concepts they carry have been at least for a century at the heart
of most translation controversies. Lu Xun (鲁迅) once said that before
translating, the translator has to make a decision : either to adapt the
original text or to retain as much as possible the foreign flavour of the
original text (Xu, in Luo, 1984: 315).
But what is the translation practice like in China? Recently I have read
two articles which show completely conflicting views on this question.
In his article entitled Chinese and Western Thinking On Translation,
A. Lefevere makes a generalization based on his comparison of Chinese and
Western thinking on translation,
When Chinese translates texts produced by Others outside its boundaries,
it translates these texts in order to replace them, pure and simple. The
translations
take the place of the original. They function as the original in the culture
to the extent
that the original disappear behind the translations. (Bassnett & Lefevere,
1998:14)
However, Fung and Kiu have drawn quite different conclusions from their
investigation of metaphor translation between English and Chinese,
Our comparison of the two sets of data showed that in the case of the English
metaphor
the image often than not retained, whereas with the Chinese metaphors,
substitution is
frequently used. [...] One reason perhaps is that the Chinese audience
are more familiar with
and receptive to Western culture than the average English readers is to
Chinese culture. (Fung, 1995)
The above conflicting views aroused my interest in finding out whether
the Chinese tend to domesticate or to foreignize when they translate a
foreign text. In what follows I shall not compare translation by Western
and Chinese translators, but rather look into the translation of English
metaphors into Chinese.
2. What is Metaphor?
The Random House Unabridged Dictionary (second addition) defines metaphor
as a figure of speech in which a term or phrase is applied to something
to which it is not literally applicable in order to suggest a resemblance.
While according to BBC English Dictionary, metaphor is a way of describing
something by saying that it is something else which has the qualities that
you are trying to describe.
Peter Newmark defines metaphor as any figurative expression: the transferred
sense of a physical word; the personification of an abstraction; the application
of a word or collocation to what it does not literally denote, i.e., to
describe one thing in terms of another. [...] Metaphors may be ’single’
-- viz. one-word -- or ’extended’ (a collocation, an idiom, a sentence,
a proverb, an allegory, a complete imaginative text (1988b:104).
Snell-Hornby rejects Newmark’s concept of the one-word metaphor in favour
of Weinrich’s definition that metaphor is text (1988:56). She believes
that a metaphor is a complex of (at least) three dimensions (object, image
and sense), reflecting the tension between resemblance and
disparity (1988: 56-57).
This paper will follow the idea that metaphor is text which includes
an idiom, a sentence, a proverb and an allegory.
3. What has been said about the translation of metaphor?
In contrast to the voluminous literature on metaphor in the field of literary
criticism and rhetoric, the translation of metaphor has been largely neglected
by translation theorists (Fung, 1995). In his article Can metaphor be
translatable?, which is regarded as an initial discussion of the subject,
Dagut says,
What determines the translatability of a source language metaphor is not
its ’boldness’ or ’originality’, but rather the extent to which the cultural
experience and semantic
associations on which it draws are shared by speakers of the particular
target language
(1976).
Snell-Hornby takes metaphor translation in the light of the integrated
approach. She says that
The sense of the metaphor is frequently culture-specific, [...] Whether
a metaphor is
’translatable’ (i.e. whether a literal translation could recreate identical
dimensions), how
difficult it is to translate, how it can be translated and whether it should
be translated at all
cannot be decided by a set of abstract rules, but must depend on the structure
and function of
the particular metaphor within the text concerned . (1988: 56-9)
van den Broeck conceives the treatment of metaphors as a functional relevancy
to the communicative situation (1981). Mary Fung also considers translating
metaphor as a communicative event which is both interlingual and intercultural
(1995).
Different from the semantic, cultural and functional perspectives mentioned
above, Newmark holds a more pragmatic approach. Drawing on his practical
experience, he proposes several procedures for translating metaphor: (1)
Reproducing the same image in the target language; (2)
Replacing the SL image with another established TL image; (3) Replacing
the metaphor by simile; (4) Retaining the metaphor and adding the sense;
(5) Converting the metaphor to sense; (6) Omitting the metaphor if it is
redundant.
Discussions of the subject, especially those written in Chinese, are also
pragmatic rather than theoretical. In E-C Translation Coursebook (1980
) which is the most widely used translation textbook in China, Zhang Peiji
(张培基) and his co-compilers summarized three popular methods for translating
metaphors: (1) Literal translation (similar to Newmark’s first procedure);
(2) Replacing the SL image with a standard TL image (similar to Newmark’s
second procedure); (3) Converting the metaphor to sense (Same as Newmark’s
fifth procedure).
Based on the methods suggested by Zhang and his colleagues, Guo Zhuzhang
(郭著章) proposes five in A Practical Coursebook in Translation Between
English and Chinese (1996, revised edition): (1) Literal translation plus
explanation; (2) Literal translation plus meaning; (3) Adapting the metaphor;
(4) Using Chinese couplets to render the English metaphor; (5) Replacing
the SL image with a TL image. 4. How Are Metaphors Translated?
The above methods, envisaged as guidelines for the translation students
as well as the practical translators, are quite exhaustive of rendering
the metaphor. Which of the methods of translation are actually domesticating
and which ones foreignizing? In the following section I will cite some
examples of metaphor translation from two translation textbooks, two dictionaries
and two articles as the source for the analysis.
4.1 Examples
Examples are cited from: (1) E-C Translation Coursebook (1980) by Zhang
Peiji (张培基) et al., (2) A Practical Coursebook in Translation Between
English and Chinese (1996, revised edition) by Guo Zhuzhang (郭著章) et
al., (3) The English-Chinese Dictionary (1993,Unabridged) by Lu Gusun (陆谷孙，chief
editor), (4) Longman English-Chinese Dictionary of English Idioms (1995)
by Li Yinhua (李荫华) et al. (revisers of translation), (5) Free translation,
literal translation and word-for-word translation (1981) by Feng Shize
(冯世则), and (6) Pragmatics and translation (1994) by He Ziran (何自然).
Example 1
But I hated Sakamoto, and I had a feeling he’d surely lead us both to our
ancestors.
但是我恨阪本，并预感到他肯定会领着咱们去见祖先。 (Zhang，1980: 12)。
(My back translation: But I ... he’d surely lead us to see our ancestors.)
Example 2
Hitler was armed to the teeth when he launched the Second World War, but
in a few years, he
was completely defeated.
希特勒在发动第二次世界大战时是武装到牙齿的初中英语教育论文，可是不到几年，就被彻底击败了。
(Zhang，1980: 13) (Back translation: Hitler was armed to the teeth ...)
Example 3
He walked at the head of the funeral procession, and every now and then
wiped away his
crocodile tears with a big handkerchief.
他走在送葬队伍的初中英语教育论文前头，还不时用一条大手绢抹去他那鳄鱼的眼泪。 (Feng , 1981)
(Back translation: He walked ... his crocodile tears ...)
Example 4
Among the blind the one-eyed man is king.
山中没老虎，猴子称霸王。(Guo & Li, 1996: 183)
(My back translation: The monkey reigns in the mountains when there is
no tiger there.)
Example 5
Talk/Speak of the devil (and he will appear).
说到曹操，曹操就到。(Lu, 1993: 463)
(My back translation: Talk of Caocao, and he will appear.)
Example 6
Peter does annoy me, coming around here all the time. Oh, talk of the devil!
That’s probably
him at the door now.
彼得真令我讨厌，老是到这儿来。哦，说鬼鬼到！在门口的可能就是他。(Li , 1995:
118)
(My back translation: ... Oh, speak of the devil, and he will appear.)
Example 7
One boy is a boy, two boys half a boy, three boys no boy.
一个和尚挑水吃，两个和尚抬水吃，三个和尚没水吃。 (Zhang, 162)
(My back translation: One Buddhist monk carries water for himself, two
monks carry water
together, three monks have no water to drink.)
Example 8
Every family is said to have at least one skeleton in the cupboard.
据说家家户户至少也有一桩家丑。(Feng, 1981)
(My back translation: Every family is said to ... family scandal.)
Example 9
A skeleton in the cupboard/ closet
衣柜里的骷髅, 见不得人的事儿 (He, 1994)
(My back translation: a skeleton in the closet, something not fit to be
seen)
Example 10
To carry coals to Newcastle
运煤到纽卡索，多此一举。
注：纽卡索 是英国的一个产煤中心地，运煤到此是多余的事。 (Zhang, 1980:163-4)
(My back translation: To carry coals to Newcastle, making an unnecessary
move)
Example 11
The teenagers don’t invite Bob to their parties because he is a wet blanket.
青少年们不邀请鲍勃参加他们的聚会因为他是一个令人扫兴的人。(Zhang, 1980:
162)
(My back translation: The ... because he is a disappointment.)
Example 12
She was born with a silver spoon in her mouth; she thinks she can do what
she likes.
她生长在富贵之家，认为凡事都可以随心所欲。 (Zhang, 1980: 163)
(My back translation: She was born in a wealthy family....)
Example 13
He who keeps company wtih the wolf will learn to howl
近朱者赤，近墨者黑。 (Guo, 1996: 183)
(My back translation: He who touches vermillion will be reddened, and he
who deals with
ink will be blackened.)
Example 14
Great men are not always wise.
人有失手日，马有失蹄时。(Guo, 1996: 182-3)
(My back translation: Men will make mistakes, horses all stumble.)
4.2 Analysis
The analysis is based on the following five common translation methods:
(1) Literal translation (retaining the same image in the target language);
(2) Replacing the SL image with a standard TL image; (3) Literal translation
plus sense and explanation; (4) Converting the metaphor to meaning; (5)
Using Chinese couplets to replace the English metaphor.
Metaphors in examples 1, 2, 3 and 6 are translated literally. The aim of
literal translation is to retain the national or local colour, the original
images as well as the foreign expressions so as to enrich the target language
. (Zhang, 1980: 161). To his ancestors (Example 1) 去见祖先 , is a
euphemism for to die. This expression is vivid and easy for the ordinary
Chinese reader to understand. Armed to the teeth (Example 2) 武装到牙齿
sounds a bit exaggerating but very impressive. The image of a person armed
to the teeth is so picturesque that it is hard for the target language
reader to forget. This literal translation has been widely accepted since
New China was established.
A more common procedure for translating metaphors is to replace the SL
image with another established TL image, if one exists that is equally
frequent within the register (Newmark, 1988: 109). The proverbs in examples
4,5, and 7, are all adapted into Chinese versions, replacing the SL images
with TL images which are familiar to the Chinese reader. These Chinese
images are widely different from but similar in sense to the original ones
. Perhaps it is all right to render the proverb in example 4 among the
blind the one-eyed man is king literally into 盲人之中单眼汉为王, because
the meaning as well as the image is clear. But the proverb One boy is
a boy, two boys half a boy, three boys no boy is a concept rather than
an image, if it is translated literally, it would be wordy and may not
be able to impress the Chinese reader as strongly as the converted version.
There has been some arguments about the translation of the metaphorical
saying Talking of the devil, and he will appear. Some (Zhang, 1980; Lu,
1993) believe that it is acceptable to convert it into 说到曹操，曹操就到
because this figurative expression is known to all, while others (Guo,
1996; Li, 1995) think that Caocao is a national figure in the Chinese history
who represents certain features of the Chinese culture. If the original
text is about western culture and western people, it would be inappropriate
to bring CaoCao into the scene. Perhaps that is why Li and his colleagues
decided to translate it literally into 说鬼鬼到 ( Example 6).
The translation method applied to metaphors in examples 8, 11 and 12 is
free translation (the usual Chinese term) or in Newmark’s words, converting
the metaphor to sense. To the Chinese reader, the image of a skeleton
in the cupboard, may mean ugly, horrible and frightening; a wet blanket
is merely a blanket which is soaked with water, and a silver spoon is
just a spoon different from a china spoon. They may not be able to understand
the referential meanings these images carry in the metaphors. Most probably
for this reason the metaphors are all converted to sense, to more general
expressions, family scandal (家丑) , a disappointment (令人扫兴的人)
and a wealthy family(富贵之家) which are abstract concepts rather than
concrete images. Snell Hornby is right in saying that as an abstract concept,
metaphor might be universal; in its concrete realization however, being
closely linked with sensuous perception and culture-bound value judgments,
it is undoubtedly complicated by language-specific idiosyncrasies (1988:
62-3).
The metaphor in Example 9 is the same as that in Example 8, but is treated
differently. Actually, there has been some arguments about the translation
of this metaphorical phrase. In an article written in 1981, Feng Shize
says that if the English idiom skeleton in the cupboard is translated
literally into 衣柜里的骷髅, the Chinese reader might not understand
what it means, so he suggested to render it to sense. In another article
written later in the same year, Xu Shigu (徐世谷) does not subscribe to
Feng’s opinion. He argues that if the first translator of the metaphor
the crocodile’s tears thought in the same way as Feng, the Chinese reader
would not have been able to understand the image, neither could the expression
be able to get into the Chinese vocabulary. Xu proposed translating it
literally plus meaning or explanation. But it took a long time for people
to accept the skeleton image:. In the English-Chinese Dictionary (unabridged)
, the standard dictionary of this kind in China, the translation of the
metaphor is nearly the same as Feng’s. It was not until 1992 had the the
skeleton image been directly brought into the Chinese culture, although
with a brief interpretation to reveal its implied meaning (see Example
9).
The translation of To carry coals to Newcastle indicates another common
problem. Zhang and his colleagues translate this metaphor literally into
运煤到纽卡?quot; and then add the referential meaning 多此一举 (making
an unnecessary move). Still they assume that it can not be understood completely
because the reader may not know what Newcastle means, so they suggest
making a note to identify this place rich in coal.
In the last two examples, we see that He who keeps company with the wolf
will learn to howl is turned into 近朱者赤，近墨者黑 (He who touches
vermilion will be reddened, and he who deals with ink will be blackened);
Great men are not always wise becomes 人有失手日，马有失蹄时 (Men will
make mistakes, horses all stumble). There is a change of image and references
in both translations. Antithetical couplets are a special feature in the
Chinese culture. When the Chinese couplets are used to render the English
proverbs, the translated version often bring in more images than the original
although the philosophy of the proverb remains the same.
5. Findings and implications
Are SL culture specific expressions replaced purely and simply or are they
more often than not retained in Chinese translations? My investigation
shows neither. From the above examples of metaphor translation and analysis,
we can see that methods 1 and 3 ( literal translation; literal translation
plus sense and explanation) are practiced with the concept of foreignization.
The translator deliberately breaks target conventions by retaining something
of the foreigness of the original (Shuttleworth &Cowie, 1997:59). The
translator’s choice, in Venuti’s words, is an ethno-deviant pressure on
target language values to register the linguistic and cultural difference
of the foreign text, sending the reader abroad (1993: 20).
Methods 2, 4 and 5 (Replacing the SL image with a standard TL image; Converting
the metaphor to meaning; using Chinese couplets to replace the English
metaphor.) are domesticating strategies, in which a transparent, fluent
style is adopted in order to minimize the strangeness of the foreign text
for target language readers (Shuttleworth &Cowie, 1997:59).
Then what makes the translator decide on the domesticating or foreignizing
strategy? My research shows that
(1) When the basic metaphorical concepts of SL and TL communities correspond,
as in to our ancestors and armed to teeth, the original image or flavour
is most likely to be retained.
(2) When they come cross SL historical, geographical or folk heritage in
cultural-specific metaphors as such to carry coals to Newcastle and a
skeleton in the cupboard/closet, the Chinese translator would try very
hard to find suitable solutions for them. The best solution so far is to
retain the original image or cultural -specific features with the support
of interpretations so that the implications of the story generally accepted
by members of the culture eventually get cross to the TL reader.
(3) The TL reader’s response is still a significant criterion and the main
consideration in metaphor translation. When the associations of an image
in the SL is lacking in the TL, for
instance, to be born with a silver in one’s mouth, a wet blanket, the
translator tends to adapt the metaphor into idiomatic target language expressions.
(4) When translating the English metaphor, particularly those embedded
in proverbs, such as He who keeps company with the wolf will learn to
howl and Great men are not always wise, the Chinese translator, more
often than not, seeks for an equivalent expression (e.g. a Chinese couplet)
to replace the original, although the equivalence is sometimes far from
accurate. 6. Conclusion
On examining the translation of metaphor and the discussion of some of
the problems involved, I have realized that different methods of translation
are changeable rather than fixed, contingent rather than eternal. Whether
to use foreignizing or domesticating strategy depends on different factors
such as the importance and the contextual factors of the SL text, the consideration
of referential accuracy, the reader’s acceptability and the pragmatic
economy (Newmark, 1988b: 110). I believe there are special problems involved
in the translation of metaphor, but the theory of the translation of metaphor
is justifiable within the general theory of translation. To sum up, in
translation practice, there is no foreignization without some degree of
domestication, by the same token, there is no domestication without some
degree of foreignization.
Reference
Bassnett, S. & A. Lefevere. 1998. Constructing Cultures: essays on Literary
translation. Clevedon/Philadelphia/
Toronto/Sydney/Johannesburg: Multilingual Matters LTD. 168 pp.
Dagut, M.B. 1976. Can Metaphor Be Translated? Babel, Vol. 22, No. 1,
pp.21-33.
Fung, Mary M.Y. 1995. Translation of Metaphor. In An Encyclopedia of Translation.eds.
Chan Sin-wai & D.E.
Pollard. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. 658 pp.
------ and K.L. Kiu. 1987. Metaphor Across Language and Culture. Babel,
Vol.33, No.2, pp84-106.
He Ziren. 1994. Pragmatics and Translation. In Fan Yi Xin Lun. Eds. Yang
Zijian and Liu Xueyun. Wuhan: Wubei
Jiaoyu Chubanshe. 849pp.
Lakoff, George & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London:
The University of hicago
Press. 243 pp.
Newmark, Peter.1988a. Approaches to Translation. London: Prentice Hall
International (UK) Ltd. X + 200 pp.
----- 1988b. A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall International
(UK) Ltd. 292 pp.
Shuttleworth, M. & M. Cowie. 1997. Dictionary of Translation Studies. Manchester,
UK: St Jerome Publishing.
236 pp.
Snell-Hornby. M. 1988. Translation Studies - An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam
/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing Company. VIII + 172 pp.
van de Broech, Raymond. 1981.The Limits of Translatability as Exemplified
by Metaphor Translation. Poetics
Today, Vol.2, No. 4, pp 73-87.
Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility -- A History of Translation.
London and New York:
Routledge XII + 353 pp.
许广平，1955，鲁迅与翻译。 《翻译论集》(1984，罗新璋编)。. 北京：商务印书馆。X
+1047 pp.
Xu Guangping. 1955. Lu Xun Yu Fan Yi. In Fan Yi Lun Ji (1984, Luo Xinzhang
Bian). Beijing: Shangwu
Yinshuguan. X +1047 pp.
张培基等，1980，《英汉翻译教程》。上海：上海外语教育出版社。VIII + 330
pp.
Zhang Peiji. et al. 1980. Ying Han Fan Yi Jiao Cheng. Shanghai: Shanghai
Waiyu Jiaoyu Chubanshe. VIII +
330pp.
冯世则，1981, 意译、直译、逐字译。《翻译通讯》第2 期，第7-8页。
Feng Shize. 1981. Yi Yi, Zhi Yi, Zhu Zi Yi. In Translation Bulletin No.2,
pp 7-8.
徐世谷，1981，衣柜里究竟藏着什么？-- 从一个译例看直译的可取。《翻译通迅》第6期，第19-20页。
Xu Shigu. 1981. Yi Kui Li Jiujing Changzhe Shenme? - Cong Yige Yili Kan
Zhiyi de Kequ. In Translation
Bulletin No.6, pp 19-20.
陆谷孙 (主编)，1993，《英汉大词典》。上海：上海译文出版社。15 + 2308 pp.
Lu Gusun (ed.). 1993. Ying Han Da Ci Dian. Shanghai: Shanghai Yi Wen Chubanshe.
15+2308pp.
李荫华等 (译审)，1995，《朗文英汉双解英语成语辞典》。上海：上海科学技术出版社/朗文出版有限公司。
|
| | |
| | | | <<<<<全文未完>>>>> 全文字数约$$$zishu$$$字 | |
| | |
| |
|
教育论文中心